Here is his attempt at ridiculing us simpletons who want to bring down gas prices by tapping more of our own energy resources here at home.
He's imitating a game show to add to the comic effect...
Hello again, everyone! I'm Matt Miller. And welcome to "You Can't Handle the Truth," our weekly quest to see if Americans can face the facts needed to solve our most pressing problemsWhen has higher taxes ever achieved its purpose?
Matt [winking]: You see the dilemma. Today's rendezvous with truth? Gas prices. With Libya in chaos and Mideast jitters sending gas past $3.50 a gallon, we'll take on the most sacred cow in the entire bovine pantheon: the entitlement to cheap gas.
In our pre-show poll, we asked our studio audience if they would support higher gas taxes (and thus even higher prices) to achieve a rare public policy trifecta. First, we'd reduce our dependence on oil. Second, we'd create market incentives to invest in clean energy. And third, we'd raise much-needed revenue to shrink our budget deficit. As a bonus, we might eventually stop sending young Americans to die for oil in the Persian Gulf, too!
Alas, 80 percent of you said "no,"
Taxes go up and so does the debt. Why? Because politicians can't stand the sight of money just laying around. They've got to spend it on pet projects, dubious enterprises, and goodies they hand out to get reelected. Money collected for Social Security goes into the general treasury to pay current bills, so what makes this naive fool think jacked-up gas taxes would go to "green energy?"
Going Green = Higher Energy Costs = More Jobs Lost
It is also a myth that increasing the price of fossil fuels will make green energy more viable. In the microcosm of the United States, sure. Just like if you jacked up the price of every cell phone except the iPhone, you would make the iPhone relatively cheaper, but it would still be expensive! If it were just us in the world, this progressive economic nonsense might work, but we're not.
We compete with other nations on an economic battlefield, and increasing our energy costs would be like shooting ourselves in the face with a cannon. The cost to industry would be crushing. We couldn't compete.
Higher gas taxes take money from working people
What about those of us who have no alternative but to drive to work? What about those of us whose job site is 20, 30 or more miles away? Gas tax takes money from the pockets of working people and bread from our children's mouths, as do most liberal schemes.
Progressive Schemes: The more complex, expensive and unworkable, the better...
Drill here, drill now just doesn't waste enough money or provide opportunities to grow government and lecture everyone, so that holds no attraction to the cognoscenti on the left. Tapping our own cheap and available resources is just common sense, therefore unappealing the the pseudo-intellectual statists on the left.
The real agenda here is to jam us all into crowded city centers and sweaty tenement slums where government trains can herd us to and from work. Of course, our social betters like Al Gore and the Obama's would live in sprawling estates in the country and uncrowded gated communities far from the teeming hordes, as befits their superior status.
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule it." -- H. L. Mencken