Showing posts with label federalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label federalism. Show all posts

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Federal Failure

It's The Education, Stupid!

Evan Thomas, in an otherwise useless Newsweek article, observes:
Grade inflation is so out of control in the nation's high schools that 43 percent of college-bound seniors taking the SATs have A averages—even though SAT scores have remained flat or drifted slowly downward for years.
The Federal Government Killed our Education System

Decline in public education can be traced back to the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act, a 60's version of No Child Left Behind. Indeed a straight line to hell can be drawn from that date, through the 1979 establishment of the Education Department, to where we are now.

The deeper the federal government and the teachers unions get into education, the dumber our students become and the more it costs us. This should provide a lesson for those who want more government involvement in healthcare.
Over 200 years ago, the nation's Founders understood that federal intervention into state, local, and family concerns like education would be futile. They knew that the federal government would be too distant and unwieldy to solve problems in the nation's diverse cities, towns, and hamlets.

It's a major reason why the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution declares that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people," and why the Constitution makes no mention of education at all. (CATO - Neal McCluskey)
Diversity Killed the Health Care Bill

Why is the health care bill so contentious, with seemingly irreconcilable demands? Because we are a diverse collection of people. We were never meant to have a national politburo imposing one-size-fits-all, we-say-so regulations on us.

Each state should hammer out its own solutions based on the particular needs of its residents. I don't want a Vermont solution here in Colorado, and I'm sure Oregon doesn't want Texas telling it what to do.
It's time to let 50 experiments bloom, as the founders intended.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

A Penny for your thoughts...

The US Mint has changed the design on the reverse of the 2010 Lincoln cent, the new coin having entered circulation on Feb 11, 2010.

Not all that of an unusual occurance and it is not the design of the new cent that I take exception to but the US Mints own description of that design:

"The 13 vertical stripes of the shield represent the states joined in one compact union to support the federal government"

US Mint Press Release

Seems to me that they got this one backasswards in a big way, is not the constitutional purpose and existence of the federal government to protect and serve the states? Did not the states form the federal government to establish justice, domestic tranquility, common defence, general welfare, blessings of liberty...and so on and so forth?

The official description approved by the 1782 congress is a simple:

Paleways of thirteen pieces Argent and Gules: A Chief, Azure.

However the designer Charles Thomson commented on the symbolism of the design and it is considered the only 'official' explanation offered about the meaning of the Union Shield that appears on the Great Seal.

"The shield is composed of thirteen stripes that represent the several states joined into one solid compact, supporting the chief which unites the whole and represents Congress. The stripes are kept closely united by the chief and the chief depends upon that union and the strength resulting from it.

A far cry from "the states joined in one compact union to support the federal government".

Well those are my thoughts...yours?

~Finntann~